Sunday, November 30, 2014

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict



Dennis Flores                                                                                           LCS-101FF-WB



The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict



        The struggle between this two peoples stretches back to the early 19th century. The Zionist Movement sparked by worsening persecution of the European Jews became motivated to find a home for all Jews and was supported by Britain at the time. On the other side in 1915 Britain had pledged to help Arabs gain independence if they rebelled against their Ottoman overlords. As a result of world war one Britain gained control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire for 30 years Britain lords over both the Arabs and Jews living in the area. In 1921 the first violent act erupts between the two peoples. After control of it was given to Emir Abdullah by Britain to form the Hashemite Kingdom of TransJordan. After years of conflict between  the two communities the united nations suggests two states be created one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. More fighting breaks out as the Arab states reject the plan. Soon after both declare themselves states and as Britain moves out fighting erupts between the two nations. Years of conflict give way to incidents like the Six Day War and other incidents. leaving us where they are today locked in a constant struggle. I for one believe both parties are at fault and that co-existence is the only option for these two nations.

           
            Both sides would disagree with my solution simply because they each believe they have a right to the holy land and the other side doesn't. They both use their historical back rounds as a foundation of their argument. The Israeli find that every time they dig in the area they find archeological proof that their ancestors had a presence in the area. Historically Israel was around up into the point of the Roman Empire they use this fact to prove the point there was a Jewish presence in the land. Others would also say it is in Americas best interest to support the Jews in Israel as they impede many would be aggressors to American interests so having a strong single Israeli nation is the best solution. They also believe in their biblical right to the holy land. The Palestinians don't believe any of it and that Israel has no right to exist. They also believe the territory to be theirs as they were legally living in it before being pushed out by the Israeli people. Like the Israeli they use their history and the Quran their holy text as a foundation for their right to live in the holy land.

           
            Both the views of the Israeli and Palestinian people are too narrow minded. Yes you both have history in the area. But that does not give the Israeli the right to displace Palestinians from their homes in the Six Day War. Although I think the Palestinians have every right to fight back against such blatant aggressive behavior it does not condone the use of more violence. It is no secret both parties involve originated from the same area historical findings prove this but that is not the real issue. The issue is that neither side wants to give an inch Palestinians don't recognize Jewish history. Organizations like Hamas only aggravate the situation these childish bickering and fighting about who shot first makes things worst. If both parties are only interested in living peacefully they should do just that. Together they could share the holy land rather then taint it with blood through the endless fighting over it.   

1 comment:

  1. Denis,

    It's good to see you posting again. This post is good in that it discusses the battle between the "historic right" of the holy land, but it does not answer the grant question of: who is the aggressor and who is the victim in this case.

    That needed to be answered - and the the facts that draw that case to a conclusion what was I was hoping that you would pull from the articles and research.

    So, you're a bit off topic in that your thesis does not clearly answer this question. You do mention your thesis, that you believe both parties to be at fault, but then you dive back into the historical right angle, as opposed to discussing the war and oppression tactics of each side.

    Try to stay focused so that you hang on to the right angle of the topic.

    Also, be sure to include images in your posts. You have none here, and they will greatly add to you design.


    GR: 74

    ReplyDelete